Students Dangerously Misled by Outdated Sex Ed Courses, Report Reveals
Sex, lies, & misinformation.
Some might argue that it's up to parents to teach their children about sex, but sex education is nothing new, and research shows that proper sex education actually delays teen sex. But according to a new report from the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), many schools are teaching sex education courses that are severely outdated.
The NYCLU's survey of 82 schools found that students are learning gender stereotypes, biases and in some cases, flat out inaccuracies.
In the NYCLU's "Birds, Bees and Bias: How Absent Sex Ed Standards Fail New York Students," they examined the textbooks, lesson plans and supplements teachers used to educate 540,000 New York students about sex. Executive director Donna Lieberman summed up the findings in a conference call on Wednesday:
"Too much is missing. Too much is inaccurate. There are far too many stereotypes and far too much bias."
When it comes to AIDS education, for example, 44 percent of schools teaching it are using scientifically inaccurate information. According to blog Albany Watch, one district even showed students a diagram that illustrated the timeline of HIV leading to a death sentence. It included an arrow pointing at a tombstone that read "RIP."
Students were also egregiously misinformed about safe sex. While 80 percent of districts taught some information about condoms, only one-third of them provided demonstrations, and some schools were teaching flat-out dangerous misinformation. They told students that condoms containing a certain type of spermicide could prevent the transmission of HIV. But, in actuality, the spermicide they cited (which is still on the market) makes it easier for the HIV virus to spread. According to the report:
"But for more than a decade, Nonoxynol-9 has been known not to prevent transmission, and to possibly increase HIV transmission in women. Misinformation of this nature is both medically inaccurate and potentially dangerous."
Furthermore, in one school, students were advised to use condoms only if they were having sex with multiple partners.
With blunders like this, why teach sex ed in the first place?
Less immediately dangerous but potentially harmful to social evolution and students' identity, the NYCLU also found that gender stereotypes were reinforced in much of the curricula. The materials included diagrams of male and female brains, illustrating that men almost exclusively think about sex while women are needy and jealous. While that may be a long-standing gender stereotype (and fodder for '90s standup material), it's generally untrue.
"Both the state guidance document and the national standards say high school student should learn about gender stereotypes and how stereotypes about gender roles can be limiting for men and women," the report reveals. Further, they add: "The national standards add that middle and high school students should learn about gender identity; gender expression; transgender people, sex stereotypes and gender non-conformity; and that biological sex, gender identity, gender expression and sexual orientation differ."
And that's another area where these schools have failed, and, I think it's safe to assume, schools across the nation are likely failing. There was relatively no information on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. For students questioning their sexuality or gender identity, sex ed could be a very informative source of guidance. Unfortunately, there's nothing offered.
The report also found that there were moral overtones to a lot of this information, and in some instances, shame-based messages. In some cases, schools taught that sex is only appropriate within the context of marriage. One textbook read:
"Waiting until marriage to have sex preserves traditional marriage … Actions that preserve traditional marriage preserve the family."
So, basically, the message is: Don't have sex before marriage or you're ruining your future family.
Related video: 5 Ways to Strengthen Your Relationship
To be honest, there's very little I remember from my junior high sex education, other than the giggling that ensued every time our uptight science teacher said the word "penis." And he knew we were giggling, too. He didn't want to teach it any more than we wanted to hear him talk about it; we all just wanted to get the awkwardness over with. But the point is, perhaps it's time to take sex education a bit more seriously.
The Heart Beat talked to one California teacher who says that the problem isn't limited to New York.
"I teach sex education in California public schools, juvenile hall and parent groups. I’m credentialed and certified. I have found two glaring errors in the most used sex-ed curriculum in the state."
The teacher, who prefers to be left unnamed, says one of the errors has to do with condom use.
"The materials that the students view in the [sex-ed] curriculum do not mention one vital step in proper condom usage: putting it on before sexual contact."
It may seem obvious, but it's still important, and apparently, it needs to be reinforced:
"Studies confirmed by the CDC show that 'Incorrect use more commonly entails a failure to use condoms throughout the entire sex act, from start (of sexual contact) to finish (after ejaculation).'"
Further, the source tells us that other parts of the curriculum leave "students to believe that condoms could be 100 percent effective for all STDs, which is medically inaccurate."
She adds that she's brought the errors to the attention of the Department of Education and Red Cross Positive Prevention, as well as the original author of the specific curriculum.
"Millions of students have been given biased inaccuracies--errors that led them in the direction of making unhealthy choices. Currently, one in four US teens have an STI (sexually transmitted infection). At a minimum, what they are taught in school should attempt to improve that figure, not make it worse."
The NYCLU is recommending that the state Education Department update its sex education regulations. They want to make sex ed more comprehensive.
"It's shocking what passes for sex ed in some New York classrooms," assistant advocacy director Johanna Miller, a co-author of the report, said in a statement. "Rigorous, binding statewide standards are essential to fix these rampant failures."
Dennis Tompkins, a spokesman for the Department of Education, added that the organization is reviewing the report.
"Our goal is to make sure students get accurate, sound health information."
More love and sex on MSN Living:
Photo: Paul Simcock/Getty Images
The best education with regard to sex is spending time on a farm.
As our society loses more and more people actually engaged in agricultural activities and "factory farms" take the place of family farms we are losing a LOT of the human knowledge that enabled us to "progress" to an urban society in the first place.
At the same time we seem to be struggling to provide our children with an, "education," and just can't seem to figure out what that's all about. (It's the teachers, it's the curriculum, it's lazy kids, it's univolved/disitnerested parents, it's lack of community support, it's lack of funding, yeah like just throwing money at something fixes it... wow... the list goes on!)
We need to have every child in America spend a year (or more) on a working farm. Perhaps that can be done with small working facilities with dorms, or some other means... but I'm telling you, if a kid sees where piglets, chicks and calves come from... sex education (and a whole lot of other subjects) won't be as necessary to try to, "teach!" They'll get the message!
If left up to parents alone:
1. Kids don't think she will get pregnant the first time out.
2. Boys are told withdrawing will prevent pregnancy.
3. Kids don't know you can catch everything from oral sex too.
4. Girls think the boys are actually emotionally ready for a 'relationship' which in fact is 2-3 months max to get a girl to put out then onto the next one. Long-term relationships are no longer the norm for teens.
5. Kids are misusing birth control resulting in decreased effectiveness such as opening condoms with teeth.
As our local high schools all have had daycare centers at maximum capacity for over 2 decades, I think spending some time revising the sex ed curriculum would make sense as well as presenting the Christian values lecture and sources for birth control just for objectivity. Parents can be told to reenforce their own values at the same time the kids are in this class at school.
they target YOUR children. once they raise YOUR children to believe in their degenerate indecent values, they believe they are no longer responsible for their own values"
You show your ignorance... and lack of knowledge of reality. The left as your refer it is trying to give kids the education they need to make informed decisions about their bodies.
The right...would prefer the kids get no information at all in the fantasy hope that the parent will provide the education at the needed time.
Do I even need to show you the stats on teen pregnancy rates in Texas? It's all the information you need to make a decision on which is the correct way. Texas abstinence education doesn't work... its plain and simple.
the Left does indeed worship, not at any spiritual altar, but at the altar of big Leftist controlling government, and even more at the altar of sexual self-gratification.
what does the indecent lowest of the low do? they drag the decent down to their level.
they target YOUR children. once they raise YOUR children to believe in their degenerate indecent values, they believe they are no longer responsible for their own values.
degenerate will always be degerate. by definition. the Left will be held to account for what they have done to our children. while they claim to care about children, that is a lie, as they care far more about their own self-gratification priorities. just look at the sewage they produce coming out of hollwood, the same garbage they lap up. the lowest will always corrupt the young. this topic is absolute proof.
beauty tips and style advice
Average shoe size is up about two sizes since the '70s, study says.
They can't escape wedding season, so they might as well look their best.
Front-row style star Miroslava Duma just clears 5′, Oscar winner Reese Witherspoon one-ups her—literally—at 5′ 1″, and fashion crush Rachel Bilson barely tops them both at a whopping 5′ 2″. But aside from standing at the diminutive end of the height spectrum, these three ladies have something else in common: the ability to nail every summer fashion trend. If you’re part of the petite girls’ club, take a look at these 12 fashion essentials—from closet staples to chic accessories—to keep you at the top of your style game this summer.
Quick, easy, everywhere-appropriate: There's no summer piece quite as versatile--or flattering.
These fresh, cute outfit ideas range from unexpected mash-ups to completely coordinated looks. What they all have in common is they'll get you out the door feeling totally confident.
Because it actually takes some makeup—maybe even a few false lashes—to look beautifully bare-faced.
Make a good impression by presenting the best form of yourself. Even when luck's against you--for instance, you encounter a huge zit the week before an important presentation--take action now. Here are fixes for your most common grooming mishaps.
Olivia Palermo isn’t the first star to wear a nontraditional bridal look! See more unique celebrity wedding dresses
We’re still dreaming about Olivia Palermo’s unconventional yet impossibly chic wedding-day ensemble. The shorts! The jutting tulle skirt overlay! The creamy cashmere sweater! Everything about this layered look is as trend-setting as it is unique.And though she may be the first star to walk down the aisle in shorts, Olivia isn’t the first celebrity to say “I do” in something nontraditional. Several boundary-pushing stars have skipped the all-white look, and instead opted for a colorful wedding dress.
Keep your tresses looking their best, even on the muggiest of summer days, with these tips
Wide-leg pants are blowing up. Six women show us how to style a pair by Lauren Ralph Lauren.
It’s the best and worst time to be a single girl in the dating world. On the one hand, past generations of women didn’t have the freedom, financial independence, access to birth control (depending on your state and employer, of course), or plethora of options to meet new people—online and off—that we enjoy today. On the other hand, they also didn’t have to worry about sexting, selecting the best selfie for their profile picture, or accidentally swiping right on a coworker.
If you’re anything like me, you probably haven’t gone anywhere near a hair accessory for years—save for the few stretched-out Goody elastics tumbling around at the bottom of your handbag, the slightly rusty bobby pins gathering dust at the back of your medicine cabinet or that scrunchie you use to pull your hair back when washing your face in the morning. For as long as I can remember, hair adornments have been slapped with somewhat of a childish reputation; when’s the last time you saw a girl over the age of 11 wearing a barrette or witnessed a woman past her teen years sporting a headband?