Do Gadgets Really Endanger Airplane Safety?
STEWARDESS: You can’t use your phone until we land, sir.
TOBY: We’re flying in a Lockheed Eagle series L-1011. It came off the line 20 months ago and carries a Sim-5 Transponder tracking system. Are you telling me I can still flummox this thing with something I bought at Radio Shack?
It’s a legitimate gripe — even more legit than working for the White House and still having to buy your own cell phone. There are plenty of us Tobys boarding flights every day and wondering how flipping on a phone, tablet or laptop could possibly result in a perilous loss of altitude.
As The Wall Street Journal recently noted in a related article, Federal Aviation Administration restrictions prohibiting the use of personal electronics during takeoff and landing date back to 1991, motivated by the concern among pilots and flight crews that such devices could affect navigation equipment or disrupt communications between the crew and ground control. But the suspected problems have never officially been verified, and the fact that countless travelers accidentally leave devices on or knowingly defy the rules outright suggests that the restrictions may have no basis in reality. The increasing number of pilots using iPads to replace hefty aircraft manuals may also be contributing to the FAA's weighing of convenience against questionable restrictions.
The truth is that nobody is really sure whether personal electronics pose a threat to aircraft safety. But the FAA aims to find out. Aware that the public is increasingly attached to electronics like a patient on a respirator, unwilling to pull the plug and have the world go dark, the FAA recently announced their plan to study whether portable electronics can be used safely during all phases of a flight, including takeoff and landing. And in an example of democracy that should make you proud to live in America, even if the political dialogue is not scripted by Aaron Sorkin, the Feds want to know what you think. On the site www.regulations.gov ("Your Voice in Federal Decision-Making"), the public has been invited to comment on the use of cell phones and other portable electronic devices onboard aircraft. Note that the input of informed engineers and communication experts will probably be considered more seriously than those professing an urgent need to play Angry Birds as the landing gear goes up. Check back with The Daily Dose for the results of the FAA's findings, expected at the end of February 2013.
Photo: Jay Silverman Productions/Getty Images
I heard the West Wing is a good show. I guess it is based in the 80'. The last Lockheed L-1011 was built in 1984. Cool plane. I was lucky enough to fly in one as a kid.
As to the main point about cell phone usage. I suspect the concern is about the non-compliant phones that may produce noise outside of the authorized spectrum thereby interfering with communication. I'm happy to turn my phone off during take off and landing if there is even a 1% chance it can cause a problem.
Look...these regulations were hatched in the infancy of cell phones when the telecommunications companies thought they were going to make a fortune on those seatback telephones. Remember those? You could swipe your credit card in a mag stripe reader and talk to anybody, anywhere, for a mere $5 a minute or whatever.
Follow the money. Always. F-o-l-l-o-w the money.
The seatback and console phones were a huge failure, in spite of the telecommunications companies lobbying (paying off) the legislators they owned.
So now it is time for some serious, scientific analysis which will show that cell phones mean diddly squat in terms of aircraft performance or safety.
inspire: live a better life
A look back on all of the tiny tasks that 30 years of technology has saved you from.
What sets you apart from everyone else looking for a new job or bigger paycheck? Your profile!
With all those deals you snagged on Black Friday, Small Business Saturday, and Cyber Monday, today is your chance to give back to those in need with #GivingTuesday.
Miss Manners provides guidance on how to handle a request for party contributions
Miss Manners instructs on why tit-for-tat never works
Miss Manners offers thoughts on guests who disregard dinner party instructions
Rinse and repeat.
Make big bucks, from home, having fun? These women got creative and figured out a way to have it all. You can too.
Your boss. You might like her, you probably respect her, but do you know how to approach someone who seems so different from you? (Spoiler: She’s actually not.)
Over the weekend, Oprah decluttered her Montecito mansion and three other properties in a Santa Barbara yard sale that brought in more than $600,000(!). (Proceeds will benefit her girls’ leadership academy in South Africa, and not half of a Crate and Barrel chair, the traditional end goal of yard-sale proceeds.)
Exclusively for MSN, we bring you a six-part series from the new book: MISS MANNERS MINDS YOUR BUSINESS by Judith and Nicholas Ivor Martin.
Miss Manners weighs in on the financial burdens of remote weddings